When Did The Net Book Agreement End
The opposing side claims that the NBA is spreading the range of published books, much of which is garbage. Without them, publishers would be more discriminatory, customers would be offered cheaper books and therefore buy more, and literary interest would be aroused. According to the company`s CEO, Tim Hely Hutchinson, the deal is history. “The NBA is collapsing around booksellers and publishers. If people feel like they are doing only one King Knut act, they will give up” In 1905, under the Education Act, the Publishers` Association introduced the practice of calling textbooks “non-net,” which gave schools discounts that were not available for other books. There have also been agreements that allow public libraries to receive discounts of up to 5% on the net books they buy.  By the 1990s, things had changed. The free market was in full swing, bookstores dominated the main streets and the only acceptable definition of the public interest in terms of price. Terry Maher, the head of Dillons, has made it his personal task to tear up the netbook deal. He forced the publishing industry into endless legal battles by discarding prominent headlines, writing shrill articles about “this outdated restrictive practice,” and putting huge resources into destroying it. He won. Perhaps publishers saw the writing on the wall – or perhaps attracted by the idea of quick profits from supermarkets – and began to abandon the arrangement. The final nail was put in the coffin in 1997, when the head of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) had the deal declared illegal by the cartel court.
Now it seemed that it was no longer in the public interest. For those who don`t know, the Net Book Agreement (NBA) was a comfortable agreement introduced in 1899 to allow publishers to set the selling price of books. The big houses agreed that they would collectively refuse to stock anyone trying to give discounts – not that they had to act very often because most retailers thought the system was also working in their best interest. The cartel court investigated the NBA in 1962, but said it was certainly in the public interest because it allowed publishers to subsidize works by important — or potentially larger — authors. This solitary voice belonged to the heroic John Calder, publisher of Beckett, William Burroughs and Henry Miller, among others. Calder denounced the Publishers` Association as “crazy, stupid, ignorant, suicidal” for not fighting the verdict. He predicted that independent traders would quickly perish, and then that the big chains that had advocated the destruction of the deal would also begin to fail, and that liberation would be in hellish chaos. He was right. In a massive blog post on her website today, the owner of Kenilworth Books continued the debate about reintroducing the NBA to protect independent booksellers from destructive discounts that began in a previous article this month.
The Net Book Agreement (NBA) was a fixed-price book agreement in the United Kingdom and Ireland between the Publishers Association and booksellers that set the prices at which books were to be sold to the public. .